Sep 30, 2010

My True Colours

EDIT: You can take a more in-depth version of the True Colours test here, for free.

Ever done a personality test? I've had the "joy" of doing three or four different ones throughout my academic and working career, and they usually take a while. They're also usually spooky accurate.

The most recent one I did is called the True Colors test. For the sake of my Canadian-ness I'll be calling it True Colours.

What True Colours told me is that I am a green foremost, with orange and gold in the middle and absolutely no blue. I imagine that my father (I know you're reading this) is a green as well, possibly an orange, maybe a gold. But not a blue. My mother is probably a blue. Knowing people's colour allows you to gauge how they wish to be interacted with, particularly what sort of guidance or feedback they need.

So enough about what it is, here's the short version of the test:
To do this test, rank the groups of words in each row (that's horizontal, folks) from 1 to 4, with higher numbers indicating that you identify with those words or feel that they are important. At the end, add up your numbers to figure out your score for each colour. Usually, one colour will come out significantly higher than the rest, but not always! One of my friends ended up with a score of 16 in three of the four colours.

For reference, here's what mine looks like:
See how overwhelmingly green I am?

As a note of interest, I completed this test with a group of co-workers, about 26 of us total. Those of us who had a high green streak completed the test more quickly, in general, than those with a blue streak. Why? 'Cause the blue individuals were busy thinking about each word while the greens mostly reacted to them.

Now, the colours get broken down like into different personality types; saying that you're green doesn't really mean anything unless you know the significance of the category. In short, orange is spontaneous and adventuresome, said to live in the present. Gold is regimented and orderly, often scheduling far into the future. Those who are blue are driven by emotions and feelings, they like to talk things out and come to ideal solutions. Finally, green is rational and accurate, valuing knowledge and competency.

Get it?

So the next time you're speaking with someone, remember what your standpoint is: a blue will use different language than a green will. It's theoretical stuff, but helpful. I would know, I'm a green.

New (School) Year


Y'know that inane practise where people pretend to commit to things at the beginning of each new year? The whole "new year, new you" kind of mentality. Well, pointless as it may be, I'm going to try for a head start this year, start with my new school year rather than the new cardinal year. What's so special about January 1st anyways?

So my list, starting this October, reads as follows:
  • send more postcards
  • run, twice a week
  • buy whole wheat or whole grain more
  • branch out from "the staples"
  • eat in with friends more often
  • write something at least every other day, notes not included
  • get to know people's names better
  • eat less, more often
  • compliment people more often
Now, why the snail? Because snails have determination. They don't go fast, but they know that. They also know that they'll arrive at their destination sometime, at their own pace. And because they are taking their time getting to that finale, they have plenty of time to think about what that finish really means to them. They can change it, modify, decide that they really don't want to end up there. So that's why I've got a picture of a snail.
So, with the inspiration of the snail in mind, is there anything you might want to accomplish next month?

snail photo by me

Sep 29, 2010

on Ankles and Consequences

I don't know where to start. In fact, I rarely know where to start in the majority of my endeavours. Stories, projects, task lists... I may know where the start is, but how do I start it?

Usually it's just a matter of sublime inspiration.

While procrastinating the start of this blog, I went to update my Blogger profile. I filled out the typical fields, stating my name and occupation and biography. But then, at the end, I came across a most unusual question:

"How is an ankle unlike a consequence?"

I found this seemingly random comparison delightful, and hasted to answer the question in an equally quirky fashion. But as I started to mull my answers, I became more and more critical of the question. Eventually, I answered by writing this:

One cannot leave their ankles behind as they walk away.

How enlightened of me, no? And then I started thinking again. Can I actually walk away from my consequences? Is that not a negative image, promoting irresponsibility? Maybe.

I'm happy to walk off with both ankles and my consequences behind me. Who's to say I haven't met those consequences already, and am now venturing past them? This is becoming much too philosophical for my tastes.

So I open up the question to you: How is an ankle unlike a consequence?

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...